Publication Ethics

JL (Jurnal Landraad) is a blind-reviewed journal published twice a year in March and September. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing articles in this journal, including the author, chief editor, editorial board, reviewers and publisher of LPPM STAI Sheikh H. Abdul Halim Hasan Al Ishlahiyah Binjai.

Journal Publication Ethics Guidelines

Publication of articles in the JL Journal which is carried out in private which is the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the author's work and the institutions that support the author. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree on standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: authors, journal editors, peer reviewers, publishers and the public.

LPPM STAI Syekh H. Abdul Halim Hasan Al Ishlahiyah Binjai as the publisher of JL Journal takes custodial duties over all stages of publishing seriously and we are aware of our ethics and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

Publication Decision

The JL Journal Editor is responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive those decisions. Editors can be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, nationality or political philosophy.

confidentiality

Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in an editor's own research without written consent from the author.

Reviewer Task

1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions

2. Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editors.

Objectivity Standards

Reviews must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate.

Source Acknowledgment

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that the observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also bring to the editor's attention any substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which they are personally aware.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with any author, company, or institution associated with the paper.

Author assignment

1. Reporting Standards

Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately on paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

2. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others, these have been properly cited or quoted.

3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author may not, in general, publish manuscripts describing substantially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Acknowledgment

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported.

Paper Writing

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the study being reported. All persons who have made significant contributions must be listed as \authors as well. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be acknowledged or listed as contributors.